Nine Democratic senators are demanding the Commodity Futures Trading Commission ban contracts that let traders bet on wildfire duration, size and destruction. They gave the CFTC until mid-August to respond, warning that fire officials see real arson risk when money flows into longer-burning, wider-spreading disasters.
Sen. Jeff Merkley from Oregon led the push alongside colleagues from California, Nevada, New Hampshire and New Mexico, all states dealing with massive burns this season. Oregon alone saw 1.7 million acres scorched through July. The senators point to $1.2 million in trading volume tied to California's Palisades and Eaton fires in January 2025, including a contract that accumulated $711,587 in bets on when the Palisades fire would be fully contained. Other markets let people gamble on acreage burned and whether flames would reach Beverly Hills.
"Offering bets on destructive wildfires threatens to minimize communities' suffering all so the rich and powerful can profit," the senators wrote in their Aug. 3 letter. They're asking whether the CFTC plans to block wildfire contracts from regulated futures markets and whether it intends to restrict betting on prediction platforms across the country.
The Polymarket Defense
Polymarket, which hosted many of these wildfire markets, pushed back immediately. The platform argues that removing these contracts won't actually prevent fires or arson, and instead cuts off a source of real-time information about disaster outcomes. In their view, prediction markets aggregate knowledge from thousands of traders and can inform emergency response by signaling where markets expect the worst damage. Kill the markets and you lose that signal.
The tension reflects a broader regulatory tug-of-war over prediction markets. Lawmakers increasingly view them as morally toxic when they monetize suffering, while platform operators argue they function as information tools. The CFTC rulemaking Merkley mentioned is still underway, and this letter likely signals what's coming in the final rule.
This article is informational only and does not constitute financial advice or guidance on trading prediction markets.

